Reunion Essay

reunification is a short allegory, written by John Cheever. John William Cheever was an American short news report writer and novelist, who lived 70 years from May 27, 1912 to June 18, 1982. He is kn possess worldwide as the Chekhov of the suburbs and for his numerous short stories and novels. 1 The short story Reunion, which I demand to analyse and interpret, was originally published in in 1962 in The saucily Yorker. 2 The text is a short act with few persons, the surroundings is non-detailed and the story spend a penny one conflict, which all are characterising a traditional short story.The story is virtually a boy named Charlie, who is traveling from his nannas in Adirondacks to a cottage on the Cape and is going to be between trains for an hour and a half in novel York. He grabs the opportunity to visit his drive, who he had non testn since his m other(a) disassociate him three years ago. As Charlie arrives to the Grand Central Station, he meets his miss begetter, and together they walked on to a nearby annihilateery. Charlie was happy to finally see his aim, and as they walked together, Charlie olympianly wanted the whole world to see them.At the restaurant the father could non behave himself because of his dissatisfaction with the service, and they ended up leaving to eat at other restaurant. At the second restaurant they ordered a drink and where having a pricey clock time with apiece other, alone the good time ended early, once again because of the fathers unsuitable demeanour. This time he was unsatisfied with the waiter, who did not wanted to give Charlie another drink, because of his age. They went to another restaurant again, where the father also started arguing with the waiter.They walked into the fourth restaurant and the very(prenominal) happened. altogether the restaurant trouble had made the time pass, and Charlie had to catch his train without a successfully restaurant visit. The father wanted to give Charlie a guinea pig to read in the train, and at their way back to the station, they stopped by a newsstand. The father began discussing with the man at the newsstand, and Charlie ended up face goodbye to his father to leave the station on the train, unhappy, disappointed and without whatsoever food or paper. The main characters in the story are Charlie and his father.Charlie is a boy, who wishes to have a father to look up to and be proud of, but got the complete opposite. Charlie is under 21, because he cannot be served alcoholic drinks in the restaurant. From what Charlie tells in the protrudening, we know that the father is big and good-looking. I think of him as a stressed businessman with too many things going on at the same time and maybe a little tread of alcohol. The reason to my thoughts is, that his wife divorced him, he have not had time to see his son since, his secretary is answering his messages and he cannot behave himself in the restaurants.In the story there is a devel opment between the father and Charlie. To begin with their relationship is good and they are both happy to see apiece other. But as the fathers behaviour is getting worsened throughout the story, Charlie begins to realise, that he feels disappointed and unhappy about his father and his behaviour. This damaging development is clearly shown at the end of the story, where Charlie ends up leaving his father with an empty feeling. The text is easy to read and it is easy to understand the language.The narrator is Charlie, and he tells the story from his own point of view. The story also tells about Charlies thoughts and feelings, for example his excitement and happiness about seeing his father in the beginning. The writer is also using direct speeches between the father and the different waiters and Charlie to show and underpin the fathers bad behaviour. The story takes place in New York, USA and the action takes place on the Grand Central Station, the 4 restaurants, the streets they are walking trough and the newsstand.The story is, like I said earlier, from 1962, but I think, that it is timeless, because it is a story, which could have happened today as well. I would even say, that the story fits 2013 better than 1962, because it is more normal and frequent to be divorced and have a particular and stressed life. There are some different themes appearing in the story. One of the themes is stress. It is clear, that the father is very stressed about something. It could be his failed marriage, his logical argument or just his insecurity about not being a good enough father to Charlie. That leads us to the next theme bad parenting.Charlie has not seen his father since the divorce three years ago, and that is of course not good parenting by neither of the parents. It is of course the fathers problem, but the mother could maybe also have had a bad modulate in the situation. I think the two themes reminds a lot of each other. In this story stress leads to bad pare nting. The fathers own life is stressed, and that is making his behaviour to other peck bad. His bad behaviour to other people is making him a bad parent, because Charlie obviously does not like being with his father, when he acts in that way.With these two themes, the main theme and the message of the story appears. I think, that John Cheever wants to remind people of the vastness of treating other people in the same way, that you treat your nearest friends and family. Because in the story it is the fathers bad treatment of other people that courses his bad relationship to his own son. That leads to the message no matter how agile and stressed you are, always remember to treat other people in the same way, that you will treat your own family, or else you will relieve the ones you precaution about.Reunion and Living with strangers have a lot of the same aspects. Living with strangers has a narrator, who describes the life in New York, where strangers does not care about you and are living their own stressed life. The narrator is from another culture, a smaller city, where it is normal to talk and care about other people, and she does not like the way the people of New York treats each other. The narrators situation is very similar to the narrator in Reunion, Charlie, who does not like his fathers behaviour.