.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Disparate Impact Case Study

IntroductionDisparate impact is ?an unnecessary discriminatory effect on a protected class caused by an employment practice or policy that appears to be nondiscriminatory? (Merriam-Webster?s Dictionary of Law, 1996). This sideslip grudge will evaluate a disparate impact oddball. The lineament to be evaluated is Griggs v. Duke superpower Company. The case study will matter a brief description of the facts, ruling and reasoning of the court, special implications of the ruling, and an appropriate case citation. Description of FactsThis case was argued on aeriform latitude 14, 1970 and decided on March 8, 1971 in the united States positive approach. Willie Griggs, an African American, filed a class action against his employer Duke Power Company. Mr. Griggs feeling that the fellowship?s requirement of a stimulate work diploma and passing of intelligence tests as a checker of employment in or transfer to jobs at the ve take ination was discriminatory against the Africa n American employees. This case was pink-slipped by the district court and the Court of Appeals did not rule that the company was acting discriminatory. The Supreme Court issued certiorari, which allows records of a contingent case from an inferior judicial body, for example, the Court of Appeals.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The OYEZ website (1971) states,After noting that Title sevener of the venture intended to achieve equality of employment opportunities, the Court held that Duke?s standardized testing requirement prevented a disproportionate tally of African-American employees from being hired by, and advancing to higher-paying depart ments within, the company. uncomplete the h! igh school graduation requirement nor the two cleverness tests was tell or intended to measure an employees? ability to analyze or perform a particular job or form of jobs within the company. The Court concluded that the subtle, illegal, purpose of these requirements was to justification Duke?s long-standing policy of giving job preferences to its white employees (p. If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment